[brlug-general] Collaboration tools for Linux..
Tim Fournet
tfournet at tfour.net
Wed May 30 09:21:47 CDT 2007
We host Zimbra for several customers, and have been for over a year now.
Here are my biggest complaints with it:
1. Lack of support for Shared Tasks - The current version lacks tasks
support in the web interface, but basic support is there within
Outlook. But this is changing in the next full release due very
soon. This doesn't effect me so much as we rely on RT for task
collaboration, but we have had complaints from customers.
2. Lack of HTML signatures in the web client. In the current version,
the automatic signatures in webmail are a text-only box. This is
expected to be fixed soon too.
3. Junk training (spamassassin) requires pressing the "Junk" button
on the toolbar rather than just dragging the message to the Junk
folder. I hear that they plan on fixing that as well.
4. The Admin GUI isn't nearly as powerful as the command-line tools.
Tasks like moving mailboxes between servers, advanced account
administration, etc, still need to be done via command-line. This
is fine for me, but makes it difficult to delegate tasks to others
who aren't as comfortable in bash.
5. Requires a dedicated server - don't try to run this on a server
already running LAMP. It can be done, but it's not pretty
6. Some configuration modifications aren't carried over during
upgrades. If you hand-edit config files, your changes will be
eaten on version updates. So, document your changes and be ready
to re-apply them after an update. I ended up writing a script that
I run post-upgrades to replace my hand-edits.
7. The Outlook connector doesn't update itself. With each new Zimbra
update, features and bugfixes happen to the Outlook connector as
well. However, users have to re-download the .msi to get the
benefit. Would be nice if the connector would detect updates on
its own and install them.
There's my list of what I /don't/ like about Zimbra. I don't think any
of these are showstoppers, but it's good information for someone who
wants to try it out. To me the benefits (see zimbra.com for feature
lists and demos) far outweigh the drawbacks.
The salesforce.com stuff looks very interesting. I'm starting to learn
about salesforce and it's platform, and it looks like there are some
interesting possibilities there for companies who build web apps and
want to link them with any type of data source. I signed up for a
salesforce demo, but haven't had the time to test out the integration
with Zimbra yet. It does require API support in your salesforce.com
account, though.
-Tim
Dustin Puryear wrote:
> After talking about Zimbra a bit, I did some more research:
>
> http://www.techevangelism.com/2007/05/30/linux-does-collaboration-almost/
>
> Zimbra integrates with Salesforce? Now that's nifty..
>
>
More information about the General
mailing list