[brlug-general] Cox and P2P

Karthik Poobalasubramanian karthik at poobal.net
Fri Jan 18 10:53:30 CST 2008


ISP usually bill downlink but then again uplink is crap on residential
connections anyway. I guess regular joes don't really care about uplink
and downlink as long as they get their stuff done.

Almost all ISP I know outside US has some kind of download limit or
surfing time restrictions.

Speaking of ISPs, does anyone have standalone DSL with ATT?

Karthik




Petri Laihonen wrote:
> That sounds bad!!
> 
> Then on the other hand, would it be
> 1) all bandwidth used
> 2) only downlink
> 3) only uplink
> 
> If ISP's indeed are going to go this way, I have a gut feeling that
> having the variable charge only on the uplink would make more sense and
> would be accepted by consumers a bit better. (Consumers whom understand
> the difference....) Or am I way off?
> 
> Then, when here in US the changes have been favorable to the
> customers.....  that would be extremely rare...
> 
> Petri



More information about the General mailing list