[brlug-general] Cox prepares to suck more.

[Will Hill]

Actually, this argument is rather old and tired.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subversive_Proposal
http://cogprints.org/1639/
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2008/02/open-access-interviews-john-wilbanks.html
http://www.eprints.org/

Why do you reject universal access to knowledge through sharing?  

On Friday 30 January 2009, Andrew Baudouin wrote:
> Will, the crux of your argument is that all information ought to be free.
>  I reject that assertion.  All of the rest of this argument has been hashed
> out already.